![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
| URGENT APPEAL: HOLT BILL (H.R. 811) MAY BE AMENDED TO RESTRICT THE USE OF TOUCH-SCREENS |
|||
|
On September 5th, Congresswoman Susan Davis introduced an amendment to the Holt Bill (see press release below) that restricts the use of touch-screen voting machines nationally in federal elections. Her amendment allows for the presence of one touch screen machine with a paper trail per precinct for those who want or need to use the machines. Her amendment is similar to California Secretary of State Debra Bowen’s recent ruling which severely limits the use of touch-screen voting machines in elections. Velvet Revolution, which has been active in the Voter Integrity movement welcomes the restriction on the “unreliable, vulnerable DRE systems.“ that has always been a major objection to HR 811. Secure-Accurate-Elections supports Velvet Revolution's call to action. We encourage you to contact the following members of the Rules Committee and House Leadership to encourage them to support Congressperson Susan Davis’ amendment. The names and numbers of members of the House Rules Committee and House Leadership are posted below. We ask you to call and politely urge members to allow for Susan Davis' DRE Amendment to Holt's HR 811 Election Reform Bill. And please pass on this information to others! House Leadership: NANCY PELOSI (D-CA) STENY HOYER (D-MD) U.S. House Committee on Rules: Democrats: LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER (NY) - CHAIRWOMANwebsite Phone: (202) 225-3615 Fax: (202) 225-7822 JAMES P. McGOVERN (MA) DORIS O. MATSUI (CA) DENNIS CARDOZA, (CA) PETER WELCH, (VT) KATHY CASTOR (FL) MICHAEL ARCURI (NY) BETTY SUTTON (OH) Republicans: DAVID DREIER (CA) - Ranking Minority Member LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART (FL) DOC HASTINGS (WA) PETE SESSIONS (TX)
Rep. Susan Davis’s Statement WASHINGTON – Congresswoman Susan Davis (D-Calif) released the following statement on her effort to offer an amendment to Rep. Rush Holt’s bill (H.R. 8 11) to ban paperless voting. “Electoral integrity is of the utmost importance to guaranteeing our democracy and I support many of the provisions of Rep. Rush Holt’s bill (H.R. 8 11) and respect the thought behind it. “However, as we have looked closely at all the issues concerning Election Day voting systems, we are still ignoring the 8,000 pound gorilla in the room. Although Rep. Holt’s bill has looked at many tough issues, there is one controversial issue that seems to come up again and again in my discussions with voters, activists and elections officials. It is an issue that has been dealt with in many states including my home state of California just recently with the Secretary of State’s Top-to-Bottom review. The wealth of data and opinions on this topic are so strong that I feel Congress would be remiss if we do not allow a debate on the question of whether and how Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) Voting Machines should be used in federal elections. “In an attempt spark debate on this issue, I proposed an amendment to H.R. 8 11 allowing every polling place to have one DRE with a paper trail for those who want or need to use it—sort of a paper or plastic option. And of course, early voting could be done electronically because it makes the most sense when voters from any of thousands of precincts show up to vote in the same place and stocking all the different paper ballots can be a nightmare. What’s more, problems of the past such as long lines from broken machines or elections with no record like we saw in Florida ’s 13th Congressional District could not happen. There would be fewer problems that lead to long lines and disenfranchisement, people with disabilities could vote privately, a true paper record would be available for recounts and costs would shrink. “It is my hope that Congress will address this issue in the near future. Our democracy is too important to ignore this issue any longer.”
|
|||